RETRACTED ARTICLE: Analysis of sports image detection technology based on machine learning

Abstract

Current sports competitions are mostly broadcast in the form of live video or video files, and information detection for athletes and sports economic processes can also be carried out through image detection technology. However, from the current situation, we can see that sports image detection technology is still immature. Therefore, this study uses sports video as a material to analyze the application of sports image detection technology. In this study, image detection technology edge detection, grayscale processing, object capture, target recognition, etc. are combined with the actual needs of sports video to achieve a variety of needs for sports image detection. Simultaneously, this study has realized the recognition of athletes, motion recognition, sports behavior judgment, etc. and built a test platform to verify the effectiveness of this research method. The results show that the research method has certain practicality and can provide a theoretical reference for subsequent related research.

Introduction

In the semantic analysis of video, how to extract the semantic concept of human thinking from video content is the focus of this research field. Crossing the semantic gap and achieving semantic concept level video retrieval is the most challenging research content in video content research. The most common methods for solving such problems are to construct a semantic index of a specific domain through semantic analysis and semantic extraction of video content. For sports video, it generally has a relatively uniform semantic structure and shooting mode, so there is a certain convenience for the semantic analysis of sports events. Semantic analysis of video data, efficient retrieval of video, sharing of video data resources, and construction of video content analysis and management systems have far-reaching research significance and practical application value.

Columbia University’s Peng Xu et al. divided the structure of the football game into two categories, running and stopping, and developed a detection system port. First, they calculated the grass color ratios in keyframes based on the color histogram, and based on these features, the keyframes were divided into three categories: close-up, panorama, and close-up. Then, according to the sports video shooting and editing rules, it is judged whether the game is in progress or suspended. In the process of detection, the system is self-learning and adjusting according to the grass color and classification decision, which has the characteristics of self-adaptation, and finally gives the experimental results [1]. The same is the processing of the football game video; another article uses the hidden Markov model statistical method to establish their own hidden Markov model group for the game to play and pause. Compared with the rule-based method, this method does not need to establish complex classification rules, nor does it need to determine the threshold, but directly learns through the training of the sample [2].

The production process of sports videos also has certain rules that can be used to analyze video content. Ekin et al. studied the scenes of sports videos. They first divided the shots into distant shots, medium shots, close-ups shots, and off-site shots based on the main color distribution of the video images. For the semantic understanding of video content, many researchers start from the wonderful event detection of video and expand the semantic analysis of video content [3].

In the event detection of basketball video, Saur et al. proposed to directly use the MPEG compression domain feature to automatically analyze the basketball video content. The algorithm detects specific events by statistically analyzing the magnitude and direction of motion vectors. Zhou et al. proposed a new idea based on the learning and classification of decision trees to analyze the content of basketball videos. They first extract the motion features, color features, and texture features from the video and then use the inductive learning method to learn the classification rules. The advantage of this method is that it can selectively use the underlying features in classification identification, which improves the processing speed [4].

In the event detection of baseball video, the researchers also have different research conclusions for different aspects. For television broadcast video of baseball games, the literature proposes a method for recognizing events based on video subtitles. Firstly, the subtitles in the video are extracted and analyzed and then related events in the baseball game are detected according to the changes of the subtitle information, and the start and end boundaries of the event are judged according to the color and motion characteristics of the frame image [5]. Chang et al. proposed a statistical-based method for detecting basketball video. Firstly, the video is segmented, and then the features such as color, shape, and camera motion are extracted in the lens. Finally, the hidden Markov model is used to establish the recognition model of the event [6].

For the processing of sports videos, some scholars have proposed some general methods. Zhong et al. divided the detection of events into two steps: compression domain-based analysis and object level-based verification. In the first step, according to the characteristics of the compressed domain, the primary selection of the event is realized by the method based on statistical learning. In the second step, the object segmentation is performed in the candidate scene, and the tennis game is the object of processing [7]. Nitta and Babaguchi propose a method for detecting events in sports videos with comprehensive text and visual features. First, the data is divided into four sets, defined as trainingset, validation setl, validationset2, and validationset3, and the classifier is trained with the first two sets, and the semantics of the third set is used to obtain the semantics of the classification [8].

University of Southern California’s Somboon Hongeng et al. proposed a method that uses semi-hidden Markov models to detect large events. This method allows for a semantic analysis of large events. The method first detects and tracks moving objects. Then, using the shape and motion characteristics of the object, the probability of occurrence of the sub-event is estimated according to the Bayesian network. Finally, the method uses semi-hidden Markov models to combine sub-events to derive the probability of a composite event occurring, that is, to analyze the probability of occurrence of a semantic event [9].

Gu Xu et al. of Tsinghua University have developed a method for detecting motion events using HMM. According to this method, motion is the most important feature of the video semantic analysis, so motion can be described by a motion filter set response to a sequence of video frames. Then, the characteristics of these reactions are taken as parameters, the event-related keywords in the HMMs are called, and the text information is taken from the closed caption of the television signal to estimate the time period during which the event occurs. Finally, the characteristics of the lens in the time period are analyzed to detect the event-related lens [10]. Wh proposed a reasoning based on semantic reasoning for events in sports video. First, a semantic reasoning framework is established. The frame consists of three layers, a top layer, an intermediate layer, and a bottom layer. The middle layer uses neural networks and decision trees to give semantics to video clips, and the top layer identifies events based on finite automata model inference. In the semantic analysis of video content, the detection of wonderful events is one of the most important tasks. We divide the methods of wonderful event detection into two categories: extraction methods based on playback mode and extraction methods based on subjective perception [11].

The subjective feeling-based method defines the highlights as the segments of interest in the video, which is based on the psychological principle to establish a subjective model, so that the highlights are detected [12]. Ma et al. propose a method for analyzing highlights based on user attention. The method integrates visual, auditory, text, and other information in the process of detection and finally extracts the wonderful segments in the video. Hanjalic uses a similar method to detect the highlights in the video based on the energy of the audio in the video, the intensity of the motion in the video, and the frequency of the camera’s switching [13]. Rui et al. proposed a method for detecting highlights based on the characteristics of the sound, and they dealt with the baseball game video. First, the voice of the commentator and the sound of the baseball hit are detected, and then the information of both is used to infer the final highlight [14].

For the problems of sports image detection, the semantic event analysis in the sports video of this article is the core. At the same time, according to the basic principles and ideas of natural language processing, the video analysis method based on rule-based basketball game is discussed based on machine learning, and some research results are obtained for the above difficulties.

Research methods

Identifying human motion requires the use of motion sensors to collect human motion data. Data acquisition components are often based on portable considerations and power considerations. It has no strong computing power, but it needs to have the equipment with strong computing ability to complete the functions of data pre-processing, recognition model training, and recognition. Therefore, the system needs to send data to the computing device by the data collector to realize motion recognition. Since the test environment will be selected in outdoor venues such as basketball courts, computing devices need to have some portability. This study uses support vector machine expansion for the part of machine learning [15].

The sample set D = {(x₁, y₁), (x₂, y₂),  … , (x_m, y_m)} is given. Among them, y_i ∈ (−1, +1). There are many hyperplanes that can separate two types of samples. The support vector machine aims to find a hyperplane to make the generalization of the partitioning of the sample stronger. In the sample space, a divided hyperplane can be described as:

$$ {\omega}^Tx+b=0 $$

(1)

Among them, ω = (ω₁; ω₂;  … ; ω_d) represents the normal vector of the hyperplane, and b is the amount of translation, which determines the distance between the hyperplane and the origin. (ω, b) is used to represent the hyperplane, and the distance from any point in the space to the hyperplane can be obtained as [16]:

$$ r=\frac{\left|{\omega}^Tx+b\ \right|}{\left|\left|\omega \right|\right|} $$

(2)

We assume that the hyperplane can correctly classify the training samples, then (x_i, y_i) ∈ D. If y_i =  + 1, then ω^Tx_i + b > 0. If y_i =  − 1, then ω^Tx_i + b < 0.

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{c}{\omega}^T{x}_i+b>+1,{y}_i=+1\\ {}{\omega}^T{x}_i+b<-1,{y}_i=-1\end{array}\right. $$

(3)

The few training sample points closest to the hyperplane make the (2–25) equations, they are called “support vectors.” The sum of the distances of the two heterogeneous support vectors to the hyperplane is:

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{c}\gamma =\frac{2}{\left|\left|\omega \right|\right|}\\ {}s.t.{y}_i\left({\omega}^T{x}_i\right)\ge 1,i=1,2,\dots, m\end{array}\right. $$

(4)

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{c}\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{\min }{\omega, b}\frac{1}{2}\left|\left|\omega \right|\right|\\ {}s.t.{y}_i\left({\omega}^T{x}_i+b\right)\ge 1,i=1,2,\dots, m\end{array}\right. $$

(5)

Equation (5) is solved to obtain the optimal hyperplane. This is the support vector machine and the basic model for studying machine learning.

Before the plan and strategy are determined, the objectives of the classification need to be analyzed, and the processes and means used are determined according to the characteristics of the classification actions. Analysis of technical movements requires the creation of abstract models of the human body. Therefore, this chapter, according to the human skeleton model, needs to analyze the characteristics of technical actions by decomposing actions. Finally, according to the characteristics of technical actions, the strategies and schemes most suitable for action classification are selected. Since different people have different understandings of the same action, or there are differences in details in the definition, it is first necessary to clarify the goal of the problem before analyzing and identifying the action. Therefore, a unified definition and explanation of the target actions of this study is first carried out. In the study, the shot image was identified and analyzed. Through the exploded view of the side motion of the basketball dribble, the human skeleton model can be established (Fig. 1). Through the changes of the human skeleton model, it can be intuitively seen that during the completion of the technical movement, the movements and changes of the limbs are the largest, and the movement state of the trunk is less obvious. In general, during the completion of the technical action, the trunk can roughly reflect the overall movement state and the trend of the center of gravity of the entire person.

Fig. 1

Exploded view of the side of the basketball dribble

In the background processing of image detection, because the background of sports video is relatively complicated and there are a lot of motion disturbances such as viewers and pedestrians, it is difficult to obtain a static background, and it is difficult to obtain a stable motion prospect directly through background subtraction. In addition, the method of background modeling is more complicated and time-consuming. Therefore, this study uses the first frame as a background image in actual research. After the background is subtracted, binarization is performed, a corrosion is performed, and two expansion treatments are performed to obtain a complete foreground area of motion. The results are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The first frame of the picture is treated as a background image

When the game environment is more complicated, the difference between the first frame and the subsequent video frames will introduce a lot of noise, which will make the foreground detection difficult. Therefore, the method of detecting the foreground area by using the first frame picture as the background is not reliable. This study attempts to obtain the foreground region of motion through the method of inter-frame difference (Fig. 3). Firstly, through the method of inter-frame difference, the grayscale image of the difference between frames is obtained, and then the binarization processing is performed, the corrosion is performed once again, the expansion process is performed twice, and the foreground is segmented to obtain the motion foreground.

Fig. 3

Inter-frame difference method. a Grayscale image. b Binarization image. c Edge image after split inspection

It can be seen from the experimental results that the method of inter-frame difference can well detect the contour of the moving target. However, in the process of weightlifting, the limb movement has local characteristics, the gap between the frames will form a void, and the foreground area obtained by the segmentation is incomplete, making the detection area inaccurate. In the initial stage and the squatting stage, the athletes exercise too slowly, which makes the inter-frame difference method detection invalid, and sometimes the motion prospect cannot be obtained at all. Therefore, we propose a foreground region detection method based on inter-frame differential accumulation.

This paper uses Matlab to carry out the simulation experiment of background difference detection target, and through the analysis of the experimental results, the target detection method based on the background difference method is improved. The target detection of this study is a simulation experiment conducted under the Windows 7 operating system and the Matlab software platform. Matlab is a mathematical software developed by MathWorks for data analysis and calculation, algorithm development, and data visualization, which is an interactive advanced computer language. Figure 4 shows the dynamic model saliency area.

Fig. 4

The salient region of the dynamic model

Compared to statistical histograms, cumulative histograms increase the amount of data stored and the amount of computation. However, this increase in a small amount of complexity eliminates the zero-value regions that are common in statistical histograms and overcomes the drawbacks of the effects of quantization over thickness in statistical histograms. Its formula is as follows:

$$ I(k)={\sum}_{i=0}^k\frac{n_k}{N},k=0,1,\dots, L-1 $$

(6)

Gradient is an important feature of edge extraction. In grayscale images, edges can be measured by gradients. The gradient is the rate of change of the value of a point in the gray image in the horizontal direction and the vertical direction. To get the gradient in these two directions is very simple, as long as the discrete partial differential operator is used to convolute the image in these two directions. Gradient vector refers to the combination of the obtained gradients in these two directions as components. Then, we can use the size of the gradient vector to represent the edge value of the point. Here, the convolution formula is:

$$ h\left(x,y\right)={\sum}_u{\sum}_vf\left(x-u,y-v\right)g\left(u,v\right) $$

(7)

Among them, g(x, y) represents a convolution kernel and f(x, y) represents a discrete grayscale image. The convolution kernel is a square matrix template. Assuming that the image frame to be processed contains a total of m pixels, and the convolution kernel is a square matrix of size 3, the time complexity of the above equation is O(9m). The Sobel edge algorithm and the Prewitt edge algorithm are commonly used algorithms for detecting image edges. Figure 5a–d represent the convolution kernels of the two algorithms.

Fig. 5

Prewitt operator and Sobel operator. a Prewitt edge operator in the x direction. b Prewitt edge operator in the y direction. c Sobel edge operator in the x direction. d Sobel edge operator in the y direction

Considering that the color image has three components, we can calculate the gradients of the three components separately, then superimpose the three gradients and use the gradient obtained by the superposition to represent the edge values. In addition, we can also grayscale the color image and then extract the corresponding gray image edge. Since the color conversion and convolution operations are linear, the two methods are actually equivalent. However, there is a deficiency in doing this, that is, the color information of the image is lost. In this way, it is not possible to extract the edges of the color image by simply superimposing the three components. The edge processing method of the color image is given below. This method uses the Prewitt operator to process the image. In the gray image, we first calculate the Prewitt edge detection operator in the x direction and then bring it into the convolution formula, then we can get:

$$ h\left(x,y\right)=f\left(x+1,y+1\right)-f\left(x-1,y-1\right)+f\left(x+1,y\right)-f\left(x-1,y\right)+f\left(x+1,y-1\right)-f\left(x-1,y-1\right) $$

(8)

As can be seen from the above formula, in fact, as long as the sum of the grayscale differences of the three pairs of points around a point is obtained, the gradient of the point can be obtained. If this method is applied to the vector space of a color image, it is only necessary to replace the sum of the grayscale differences with the sum of the vector modes. That is in the color image:

$$ h\left(x,y\right)=\left|\left|f\left(x+1,y+1\right)-f\left(x-1,y-1\right)\right|\right|+\left|\left|f\left(x+1,y\right)-f\left(x-1,y\right)\right|\right|+\left|\left|f\left(x+1,y-1\right)-f\left(x-1,y-1\right)\right|\right| $$

(9)

Among them, f(x,y) is the vector point in the color image, and the polynomial ||a − b|| represents the modulus of the vectors a and b. This method counts each color component information of the color image, and there is no loss of image information. Thus, for each color pixel, the entire color pixel vector is considered, and the three color components of each pixel are also considered. Of course, we can also calculate the Prewitt edge detection operator in the x direction and then bring it into the convolution formula, so that the gradient in the y direction can be obtained as follows:

$$ h\left(x,y\right)=\left|\left|f\left(x+1,y+1\right)-f\left(x+1,y-1\right)\right|\right|+\left|\left|f\left(x,y+1\right)-f\left(x,y-1\right)\right|\right|+\left|\left|f\left(x-1,y+1\right)-f\left(x-1,y-1\right)\right|\right| $$

(10)

The Color-Prewitt algorithm is an algorithm for detecting the edges of an image taking into account both the x and y directions. Similarly, the Color-Sobel algorithm in the x direction is:

$$ h\left(x,y\right)=\left|\left|f\left(x+1,y+1\right)-f\left(x-1,y+1\right)\right|\right|+2\left|\left|f\left(x+1,y\right)-f\left(x-1,y\right)\right|\right|+\left|\left|f\left(x+1,y-1\right)-f\left(x-1,y-1\right)\right|\right| $$

(11)

The Color-Sobel algorithm in the y direction is:

$$ h\left(x,y\right)=\left|\left|f\left(x+1,y+1\right)-f\left(x+1,y+1\right)\right|\right|+2\left|\left|f\left(x,y+1\right)-f\left(x,y-1\right)\right|\right|+\left|\left|f\left(x-1,y+1\right)-f\left(x-1,y-1\right)\right|\right| $$

(12)

One thing to note is that the gradient value is a scalar, so the edge value represented by the gradient is also a scalar.

Results

In order to study the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, basketball is taken as an example for the analysis. The experiment carried out in this section is to verify the effectiveness of the detection feature proposed by the algorithm that basketball video scoring event is the free throw. In order to determine the minimum time interval between the suspension of the game and the start of the free throw, the samples in the training set were counted. The results are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Correspondence between the time interval between the suspension of the game and the change of the score with whether the goal is a free throw (video frame rate is 25)

Among them, V0 to V5 represent different basketball game videos as training samples. The goal score in the table refers to the score conversion of the score after the game is suspended (in actual situations, the change in the score corresponding to the game goal may occur after the game is suspended, such as the game is suspended while the ball is being played). According to the determined threshold, the detection result of whether the goal in the basketball video is the free throw is as follows.

Among them, V6 to V11 represent six different basketball game videos in the test set. According to the experimental results, it can be seen that the characteristics proposed by the algorithm in this paper can effectively judge whether the basketball video scoring event is a free throw.

Two experiments were conducted in this study. The first experiment is the comparison of the accuracy of different models for the numerical recognition before and after the conversion, and the second experiment is the three-point detection in the algorithm. The score digital recognition experiment first compared three different chained CRF models. The first is to independently identify the scores before and after the conversion (maximum entropy model ME), the second is the general form of first-order chain CRF (LC-CRF), and the third is the domain-based recognition model, KE-CRF. The experiment tested six different basketball game videos in the data set. The experimental results are shown in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 Recognition result that whether the type of goal score in the basketball video is a free throw

Table 3 Comparison of the accuracy of score recognition before and after conversion of different CRF models

The test result of whether the basketball video score based on KE-CRF is a three-pointer is as follows (Table 4).

Table 4 Test result that whether the basketball video score is a three-point

Discussion and analysis

The commonly used functions are summarized as follows: (1) The VideoReader() function and the read() function are pre-processing functions for the video. Among them, the VideoReader() function can be used to input a video and return a sequence of images. This function is more powerful in Matlab 2014 and can read videos in multiple formats. The read() function reads the image of each frame from the video sequence returned by the VideoReader() function and returns the image for subsequent use. (2) The rgb2gray() function converts RGB images into grayscale images. Since current video capture devices generally acquire color image video, and grayscale images are often used in later processing, this function is often used. (3) The imabsdi ff() function is a mandatory function of the background difference method. (4) The im2bw() function is also a function that must be used in the background difference method. Its function is to convert grayscale images into binary images. (5) imdilate() and imerode() functions and imopen() and imclose() functions are the four mathematical morphology functions, which represent expansion and corrosion function and open and close operations, respectively. Mathematical morphology processing of the binarized image can result in a better target area. This study combines the actual situation to improve the algorithm, combines various algorithms to achieve innovation, and applies it to sports video image processing.

There are many ways to describe image color features, where color histograms are a widely used color feature. At the same time, color histograms are mostly used in the judgment of team colors. The color histogram does not care about the spatial position of the color. It describes the proportion of different colors in the whole image, which can reflect the statistical distribution and basic color of the image color, and is easy to calculate. Especially for images with significantly different background and foreground color distributions, a bimodal characteristic appears on the histogram, so that the foreground and background can be distinguished according to the histogram relationship. Therefore, this study uses a cumulative histogram to distinguish.

Through the observation of sports videos, it is found that in different sports teams, different players will have the same number. In this case, players with the same jersey number should be distinguished according to the team. In sports competitions, in order to distinguish between the players of each team and the referees, the color of the players and referees of each team is obviously different. In particular, the jersey colors of the players on both sides of the game are significantly different, and because the home and away are different, one party is sometimes brighter and the other is darker. Therefore, this paper uses the detected color characteristics of the player or jersey area to measure the similarity, thus judging the team’s team, and laying the foundation for the subsequent player identity certification.

When all possible colors are not included in an image, some areas with an eigenvalue of zero will appear in the statistical histogram. These areas with zero eigenvalues affect the measure of similarity and do not correctly reflect the color difference between the images. The cumulative histogram is proposed to solve this problem, and it can better reflect the difference in features between images. In the cumulative histogram, adjacent colors are statistically related in frequency.

It can be seen from the experimental results that the ME model does not consider the constraints of the conversion mode of the score number, and the recognition rate is the lowest. In the experiment, LC-CRF misidentified part of the score number into an impossible pattern, such as (2,6). This indicates that this model cannot automatically learn the domain knowledge of the score transformation mode through the training data. In comparison, the KE-CRF model proposed in this chapter can achieve higher score digital recognition accuracy. The experiment also compares the score recognition model proposed in this chapter with the score digital recognition model proposed in the existing work. According to the experimental results, the recognition accuracy of the recognition model based on Zernike Moment + template matching is less than 80%, and the accuracy of the digital recognition model based on shape features is 90%.

The experimental results show that the accuracy of KE-CRF in the accuracy of three-point detection is higher than that of digital recognition. This is because accurate free throw test results help reduce errors that the model may make when identifying (e.g., mistaking the score from 5 to 6 as a score from 5 to 8). This verifies the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in a variety of models.

Conclusion

Based on the detection of sports video content, this paper deeply analyzes the construction and optimization technology of depth model, and according to the characteristics of depth model, the migration learning technology based on the deep network is analyzed. The classifier is trained to classify and achieve the best results. It can be seen that the combination of the depth model and the traditional machine learning algorithm is a feasible solution. Identifying human motion requires the use of motion sensors to collect human motion data. Data acquisition components are usually based on portable considerations and power consumption considerations. It does not have a strong computing power but requires devices with strong computing power to perform data pre-processing, recognition model training, and recognition functions. Therefore, the system needs to send data to the computing device by the data collector to realize motion recognition. At the same time, this study uses a support vector machine to carry out the machine learning process, and the corresponding algorithm is formulated. Meanwhile, this study combines image recognition and image processing technology to realize the recognition of sports process. Finally, the research algorithm is combined with the traditional model to identify and analyze the basketball video, and the experimental analysis is carried out. The first experiment is a comparison of the accuracy of different models for the identification of scores before and after conversion. The second experiment is the three-point detection in the algorithm. The research results show that the sports image detection technology of this study has certain practicality.