Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of the proposed overall algorithm with the CTDM, FIVG and FBDA algorithms

From: Fast CU size decision and intra-prediction mode decision method for H.266/VVC

Sequences

CTDM [20] (VTM4.0)

FIVG [21] (VTM4.0)

FBDA [33] (VTM4.0)

Proposed (VTM7.0)

BDBR (%)

ATS (%)

BDBR (%)

ATS (%)

BDBR (%)

ATS (%)

BDBR (%)

ATS (%)

Class B

1920 × 1080

Kimono

1.05

34.33

1.72

66.59

1.98

41.82

1.22

57.56

ParkScene

1.11

34.56

1.28

56.28

1.38

31.60

0.95

59.22

BQTerrace

1.00

31.07

1.16

49.44

1.19

29.47

1.29

52.41

Class C

832 × 480

PartyScene

0.76

35.93

0.28

41.71

1.05

35.23

0.95

53.66

RaceHorsesC

0.82

36.06

0.84

52.07

2.96

33.89

0.91

53.75

BasketballDrill

1.67

33.94

1.91

53.05

1.36

28.73

0.94

50.68

Class D

416 × 240

BlowingBubbles

0.74

35.04

0.49

43.90

0.73

21.87

0.91

54.88

RaceHorses

0.95

35.96

0.54

44.93

1.59

31.83

1.01

49.45

BQSquare

0.61

33.98

0.17

32.34

− 0.11

23.00

1.16

55.55

Class E

1280 × 720

Johnny

1.44

33.02

3.07

62.55

1.51

24.44

0.96

59.33

FourPeople

1.38

35.05

2.55

62.18

1.37

26.65

0.89

58.72

KristenAndSara

1.19

32.95

2.56

60.82

1.53

25.32

1.23

57.62

Average

1.06

34.32

1.38

52.16

1.38

29.49

1.04

55.24