Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of the proposed overall algorithm with the FQPD and ACSD algorithms

From: Fast CU size decision and intra-prediction mode decision method for H.266/VVC

Sequences

FQPD[22] (VTM7.0)

ACSD[30] (VTM5.0)

Proposed (VTM7.0)

BDBR (%)

ATS (%)

BDBR (%)

ATS (%)

BDBR (%)

ATS (%)

Class B

1920 × 1080

Kimono

1.93

59.51

0.87

32.32

1.22

57.56

ParkScene

1.26

51.84

0.83

35.41

0.95

59.22

BQTerrace

1.08

45.30

0.95

34.50

1.29

52.41

Class C

832 × 480

PartyScene

0.26

38.62

0.55

31.10

0.95

53.66

RaceHorsesC

0.88

49.05

0.37

23.63

0.91

53.75

BasketballDrill

1.82

48.48

1.30

33.39

0.94

50.68

Class D

416 × 240

BlowingBubbles

0.47

40.35

0.95

33.90

0.91

54.88

RaceHorses

0.54

41.69

0.71

31.79

1.01

49.45

BQSquare

0.19

31.95

0.68

30.73

1.16

55.55

Class E

1280 × 720

Johnny

3.22

56.88

1.72

38.85

0.96

59.33

FourPeople

2.70

57.57

1.35

38.01

0.89

58.72

KristenAndSara

2.78

55.11

1.61

34.84

1.23

57.62

Average

1.43

48.03

0.99

33.21

1.04

55.24