Table 7 Comparison with existing methods
Method | Year | Comparison measures | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â | Sen % | Spec % | Prec % | Accuracy % |
Apple scab comparison | |||||
Samajpati et al. [2] | 2016 | – | – | – | 80 |
Dubey et al. [35] | 2012 | – | – | – | 96.96 |
Shiv et al. [5] | 2016 | – | – | – | 93.75 |
Lucas et al. [53] | 2016 | 86.6 | – | 92.8 | 96.6 |
Proposed | 2017 | 97.0 | 96.4 | 96.70 | 97.1 |
Apple rust comparison | |||||
Zhang et al. [29] | 2017 | – | – | – | 94.28 |
Proposed | 2017 | 95.05 | 92.7 | 94.3 | 94.70 |
Grapes rot leave comparison | |||||
Kharde et al. [36] | 2016 | – | – | – | 95.23 |
Proposed | 2017 | 96.25 | 92.50 | 97.10 | 96.60 |
Grapes leaf blight | |||||
Kharde et al. [36] | 2016 | – | – | – | 92.85 |
Padol et al. [37] | 2016 | – | – | – | 83.33 |
Proposed | 2017 | 96.30 | 97.0 | 96.3 | 96.30 |
Final classification | 2017 | 97.05 | – | 97.60 | 97.70 |