Skip to main content

Table 3 The retrieval performance of the top 500 ranked images in MAP (%) for difference approaches on NUS-WIDE and Flickr

From: Online social image ranking in diversified preferences

Datasets NUS-WIDE
Methods SR SR+BOW SR+GlV SR+lc SR+tm SR+gp SR+ctg SR+id SR+all
PAMIR-PR (shallow) 27.6 28.3 30.6 27.9 26.9 28.0 28.2 27.9 31.4
PAMIR-PR (deep) 29.1 30.2 31.3 28.9 28.2 29.3 29.4 29.4 32.6
MMNN-PR (shallow) 26.3 26.9 27.8 26.3 25.5 26.9 27.3 25.9 29.5
MMNN-PR (deep) 28.2 29.0 30.4 29.4 28.3 29.1 30.1 28.1 31.3
SCM-PR (shallow) 21.5 21.9 23.7 21.5 20.1 21.9 22.1 21.2 24.4
SCM-PR (deep) 23.4 23.8 25.6 23.9 23.2 23.7 24.2 23.0 25.5
CMOS lg-PR 36.4 36.8 38.4 37.0 36.7 37.1 37.6 36.0 38.8
Deep-PR 38.7 38.9 40.9 39.8 39.3 39.8 39.9 38.5 41.6
OSIR s (shallow) 31.7 32.2 32.9 32.0 31.8 32.1 32.5 31.9 32.6
OSIR s (deep) 35.9 36.7 38.3 36.4 36.1 36.4 36.9 36.3 38.9
OSIR (shallow) 38.5 39.4 40.3 39.1 38.4 38.7 40.4 39.1 43.8
OSIR (deep) 40.3 41.2 41.8 41.1 40.1 40.6 41.3 40.7 44.4
Datasets Flickr
Methods SR SR+BOW SR+GlV SR+lc SR+tm SR+gp SR+ctg SR+id SR+all
PAMIR-PR (shallow) 12.4 13.2 13.9 12.8 12.0 13.1 14.0 12.3 14.5
PAMIR-PR (deep) 15.1 15.9 16.7 15.5 15.0 16.1 17.2 15.2 17.9
MMNN-PR (shallow) 12.1 12.9 13.4 12.6 11.8 13.2 13.6 12.0 14.0
MMNN-PR (deep) 14.8 15.3 15.9 15.5 14.2 16.1 16.4 14.9 16.9
SCM-PR (shallow) 5.8 6.2 6.7 5.9 5.5 6.5 6.9 6.3 7.6
SCM-PR (deep) 7.2 7.8 8.6 7.4 7.8 8.1 8.9 7.1 9.4
CMOS lg-PR 19.4 20.1 21.6 19.9 19.7 20.3 21.4 19.2 23.7
Deep-PR 19.9 20.3 21.8 20.2 20.0 20.9 22.0 19.5 24.1
OSIR s (shallow) 14.3 15.1 15.8 14.9 14.4 15.8 16.2 15.1 18.1
OSIR s (deep) 16.5 17.1 18.3 16.9 16.7 17.2 17.8 17.1 20.3
OSIR (shallow) 18.1 19.3 19.8 19.2 18.3 20.2 20.3 18.9 23.4
OSIR (deep) 20.6 21.2 21.9 21.4 20.7 21.7 22.7 21.4 25.3