Table 8 Comparison of overall effectiveness of our method and Viterbi
From: Named entity recognition for Chinese judgment documents based on BiLSTM and CRF
| Method | Entity type | Precision | Recall | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our method | Person name | 73.09 | 76.54 | 74.78 |
| Organization name | 66.69 | 61.48 | 64.10 | |
| Laws and regulations | 92.59 | 94.34 | 93.46 | |
| Accusation | 76.67 | 74.43 | 73.95 | |
| Penalty | 77.12 | 72.80 | 74.90 | |
| Overall | 77.08 | 73.69 | 75.35 | |
| Viterbi | Person name | 74.13 | 77.02 | 75.55 |
| Organization name | 68.22 | 62.58 | 65.28 | |
| Laws and regulations | 94.41 | 95.74 | 95.07 | |
| Accusation | 77.38 | 74.95 | 76.15 | |
| Penalty | 78.43 | 74.02 | 76.16 | |
| Overall | 78.13 | 74.56 | 76.30 |