Table 8 Comparison of overall effectiveness of our method and Viterbi
From: Named entity recognition for Chinese judgment documents based on BiLSTM and CRF
Method | Entity type | Precision | Recall | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Our method | Person name | 73.09 | 76.54 | 74.78 |
| Â | Organization name | 66.69 | 61.48 | 64.10 |
| Â | Laws and regulations | 92.59 | 94.34 | 93.46 |
| Â | Accusation | 76.67 | 74.43 | 73.95 |
| Â | Penalty | 77.12 | 72.80 | 74.90 |
| Â | Overall | 77.08 | 73.69 | 75.35 |
Viterbi | Person name | 74.13 | 77.02 | 75.55 |
| Â | Organization name | 68.22 | 62.58 | 65.28 |
| Â | Laws and regulations | 94.41 | 95.74 | 95.07 |
| Â | Accusation | 77.38 | 74.95 | 76.15 |
| Â | Penalty | 78.43 | 74.02 | 76.16 |
| Â | Overall | 78.13 | 74.56 | 76.30 |