Skip to main content

Table 3 Error rate (%) of the proposed and other stereo matching algorithms

From: Shape-reserved stereo matching with segment-based cost aggregation and dual-path refinement

Methods

Sun [31]

Hsieh [29]

Kuo et al. [27]

E-SM [37]

S-ASW [23]

Proposed

Cones

Non-occ

6.69

5.62

4.44

15.64

7.44

5.59

All

13.72

13.23

10.96

24.6

13.49

12.06

Disc

18.70

14.36

10.22

27.22

16.79

13.24

Teddy

Non-occ

10.57

8.75

9.39

20.84

8.73

9.57

All

17.96

16.23

15.52

28.83

14.78

15.50

Disc

23.60

26.32

19.16

34.81

23.57

25.08

Tsukuba

Non-occ

6.70

4.26

4.38

5.15

2.59

2.79

All

8.11

5.18

5.35

7.05

2.89

3.05

Disc

19.67

17.42

17.12

19.93

13.26

13.93

Venus

Non-occ

1.54

1.98

4.15

5.49

0.48

0.38

All

2.08

2.43

5.09

7.01

0.68

0.64

Disc

12.96

6.45

10.71

30.02

4.21

4.88

Average

11.86

9.21

9.23

10.40

9.08

8.89