Skip to main content

Table 3 Error rate (%) of the proposed and other stereo matching algorithms

From: Shape-reserved stereo matching with segment-based cost aggregation and dual-path refinement

Methods Sun [31] Hsieh [29] Kuo et al. [27] E-SM [37] S-ASW [23] Proposed
Cones Non-occ 6.69 5.62 4.44 15.64 7.44 5.59
All 13.72 13.23 10.96 24.6 13.49 12.06
Disc 18.70 14.36 10.22 27.22 16.79 13.24
Teddy Non-occ 10.57 8.75 9.39 20.84 8.73 9.57
All 17.96 16.23 15.52 28.83 14.78 15.50
Disc 23.60 26.32 19.16 34.81 23.57 25.08
Tsukuba Non-occ 6.70 4.26 4.38 5.15 2.59 2.79
All 8.11 5.18 5.35 7.05 2.89 3.05
Disc 19.67 17.42 17.12 19.93 13.26 13.93
Venus Non-occ 1.54 1.98 4.15 5.49 0.48 0.38
All 2.08 2.43 5.09 7.01 0.68 0.64
Disc 12.96 6.45 10.71 30.02 4.21 4.88
Average 11.86 9.21 9.23 10.40 9.08 8.89