Skip to main content

Table 4 Robustness (%) comparison with four CIS methods in four benchmark datasets

From: Coverless image steganography based on DenseNet feature mapping

Dataset Method Compression Gauss noise Gauss filtering Scaling C-H-E Gramma
Holidays HASH-CIS 74.00 94.80 96.20 97.40 28.20 41.00
  PIX-CIS 95.40 99.80 100.00 100.00 72.80 82.80
  DCT-CIS 94.80 100.00 99.80 100.00 73.00 83.00
  DWT-CIS 94.38 99.73 99.91 99.91 70.98 79.55
  Proposed method 62.40 81.80 92.20 89.00 54.60 71.20
ImageNet HASH-CIS 52.77 87.23 90.18 93.04 23.84 33.84
  PIX-CIS 95.27 99.64 99.91 99.82 71.07 79.73
  DCT-CIS 92.77 99.82 99.91 100.00 69.91 78.75
  DWT-CIS 94.29 99.64 99.91 99.91 70.89 79.29
  Proposed method 49.20 89.38 89.11 96.70 69.11 84.29
Caltech-101 HASH-CIS 55.41 89.27 89.76 92.00 27.12 42.15
  PIX-CIS 94.63 97.66 99.51 99.61 66.54 66.54
  DCT-CIS 94.54 98.05 100.00 99.90 67.02 80.88
  DWT-CIS 95.61 99.51 99.90 100.00 67.80 79.12
  Proposed method 80.59 92.10 95.32 99.12 81.27 89.85
Caltech-256 HASH-CIS 52.10 87.98 88.55 93.80 19.94 41.70
  PIX-CIS 93.03 93.32 99.33 99.62 64.41 82.06
  DCT-CIS 91.60 94.08 99.71 99.81 64.50 82.54
  DWT-CIS 94.37 95.42 99.90 100.00 66.79 82.92
  Proposed method 73.57 87.12 93.89 98.57 75.19 87.98