Skip to main content

Table 4 Robustness (%) comparison with four CIS methods in four benchmark datasets

From: Coverless image steganography based on DenseNet feature mapping

Dataset

Method

Compression

Gauss noise

Gauss filtering

Scaling

C-H-E

Gramma

Holidays

HASH-CIS

74.00

94.80

96.20

97.40

28.20

41.00

 

PIX-CIS

95.40

99.80

100.00

100.00

72.80

82.80

 

DCT-CIS

94.80

100.00

99.80

100.00

73.00

83.00

 

DWT-CIS

94.38

99.73

99.91

99.91

70.98

79.55

 

Proposed method

62.40

81.80

92.20

89.00

54.60

71.20

ImageNet

HASH-CIS

52.77

87.23

90.18

93.04

23.84

33.84

 

PIX-CIS

95.27

99.64

99.91

99.82

71.07

79.73

 

DCT-CIS

92.77

99.82

99.91

100.00

69.91

78.75

 

DWT-CIS

94.29

99.64

99.91

99.91

70.89

79.29

 

Proposed method

49.20

89.38

89.11

96.70

69.11

84.29

Caltech-101

HASH-CIS

55.41

89.27

89.76

92.00

27.12

42.15

 

PIX-CIS

94.63

97.66

99.51

99.61

66.54

66.54

 

DCT-CIS

94.54

98.05

100.00

99.90

67.02

80.88

 

DWT-CIS

95.61

99.51

99.90

100.00

67.80

79.12

 

Proposed method

80.59

92.10

95.32

99.12

81.27

89.85

Caltech-256

HASH-CIS

52.10

87.98

88.55

93.80

19.94

41.70

 

PIX-CIS

93.03

93.32

99.33

99.62

64.41

82.06

 

DCT-CIS

91.60

94.08

99.71

99.81

64.50

82.54

 

DWT-CIS

94.37

95.42

99.90

100.00

66.79

82.92

 

Proposed method

73.57

87.12

93.89

98.57

75.19

87.98