Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance of the proposed method in comparison to the state-of-the-art frameworks

From: Clustered nuclei splitting based on recurrent distance transform in digital pathology images

 

Methods

TPR

PPV

F1

MDR

FDR

USR

OSR

Jaccard

Time

Classical

None

0.647

0.766

0.686

0.03

0.15

0.33

0.08

0.72

 
 

Watershed

0.723

0.754

0.727

0.04

0.14

0.25

0.09

0.72

155

 

Proposed method

0.839

0.667

0.734

0.06

0.13

0.11

0.18

0.71

105

 

H-minima

0.738

0.729

0.724

0.05

0.14

0.23

0.12

0.71

129

 

Huang

0.676

0.513

0.576

0.31

0.25

0.02

0.19

0.52

77

 

Kong

0.785

0.611

0.672

0.06

0.11

0.17

0.25

0.70

277

 

Mouelhi

0.778

0.587

0.652

0.07

0.12

0.16

0.26

0.70

292

Frameworks

IJ_IHCtoolbox

0.541

0.848

0.643

0.43

0.03

0.05

0.12

0.63

 
 

Qupath_def

0.796

0.510

0.612

0.16

0.25

0.05

0.20

0.66

 
 

Qupath_exSep

0.869

0.576

0.682

0.08

0.21

0.06

0.18

0.74

 
 

Tmarker

0.265

0.587

0.334

0.72

0.37

0.05

0.03

0.43

 

DL

Chen

0.776

0.700

0.724

0.20

0.25

0.04

0.04

0.55

 
 

U-net

0.459

0.724

0.555

0.50

0.20

0.09

0.07

0.64

Â