Table 2 Errors generated by chamfer masks applied to real images
From: Optimum design of chamfer masks using symmetric mean absolute percentage error
Image ID | Mask size | Metric | SMAPE (%) | MAE (%) | MSE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOP1 | 3Ă—3 | Butt et al. | 1.2548 | 810.51 | 102.28 |
| Â | Â | Proposed real-valued weights | 1.2473 | 802.91 | 101.12 |
| Â | Â | Proposed integer weights | 1.2472 | 802.89 | 101.12 |
| Â | 5Ă—5 | Butt et al. | 0.3735 | 237.35 | 30.52 |
| Â | Â | Proposed real-valued weights | 0.3729 | 236.79 | 30.44 |
| Â | Â | Proposed integer weights | 0.3729 | 236.79 | 30.44 |
| Â | 7Ă—7 | Butt et al. | 0.1553 | 96.94 | 13.09 |
| Â | Â | Proposed real-valued weights | 0.1473 | 91.77 | 12.86 |
| Â | Â | Proposed integer weights | 0.1953 | 125.77 | 15.84 |
SOP2 | 3Ă—3 | Butt et al. | 1.2274 | 525.85 | 69.83 |
| Â | Â | Proposed real-valued weights | 1.2238 | 522.69 | 69.22 |
| Â | Â | Proposed integer weights | 1.2237 | 522.66 | 69.22 |
| Â | 5Ă—5 | Butt et al. | 0.3737 | 153.78 | 20.69 |
| Â | Â | Proposed real-valued weights | 0.3732 | 153.47 | 20.64 |
| Â | Â | Proposed integer weights | 0.3731 | 153.45 | 20.64 |
| Â | 7Ă—7 | Butt et al. | 0.1620 | 65.57 | 9.12 |
| Â | Â | Proposed real-valued weights | 0.1558 | 62.25 | 8.88 |
| Â | Â | Proposed integer weights | 0.1952 | 80.06 | 10.51 |
SOP3 | 3Ă—3 | Butt et al. | 1.3446 | 846.14 | 104.86 |
| Â | Â | Proposed real-valued weights | 1.3244 | 832.85 | 103.15 |
| Â | Â | Proposed integer weights | 1.3245 | 832.93 | 103.16 |
| Â | 5Ă—5 | Butt et al. | 0.3406 | 206.87 | 26.65 |
| Â | Â | Proposed real-valued weights | 0.3407 | 206.84 | 26.64 |
| Â | Â | Proposed integer weights | 0.3408 | 206.91 | 26.65 |
| Â | 7Ă—7 | Butt et al. | 0.1339 | 82.50 | 11.31 |
| Â | Â | Proposed real-valued weights | 0.1245 | 75.51 | 10.74 |
| Â | Â | Proposed integer weights | 0.1958 | 119.00 | 14.69 |