Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of running times (in seconds) of the proposed approach based on use of cumulative space and a naive implementation; case of the toy example patterns involving three objects to detect in each simulated image; running times averaged on 5 realisations on a standard laptop computer (Core i7 2670QM@2.2Ghz, 4Go RAM)

From: Efficient evaluation of the Number of False Alarm criterion

Pattern

Proposed use of cumulative space

Naive implementation

Time gain factor

Tiles

0.842 s

521.4 s

619

Strips

1.622 s

6095 s

3757

Rings

3.622 s

4501 s

1243