Skip to main content

Table 7 Entropic measure value comparison between results obtained using different enhancement methods on standard benchmark face datasets

From: A new evaluation function for face image enhancement in unconstrained environments using metaheuristic algorithms

Database

LCS

HE

IIA

M_PSO

M_GA

BDPFHE

CLAHE

LLIE

Proposed

AR

 Image 1

7.4463

5.9567

7.4463

7.7381

7.7415

7.2321

7.8153

7.4387

7.7312

 Image 2

7.1931

5.9504

7.1931

7.6573

7.6578

6.8574

7.6891

7.1804

7.8393

 Image 3

7.413

5.931

7.413

7.6654

7.661

7.0664

7.7904

7.2489

7.7804

 Image 4

7.635

5.9717

7.635

7.7815

7.786

7.2305

7.7595

7.0171

7.8593

 Image 5

7.5609

5.8266

7.5609

7.5745

7.5721

7.1865

7.708

7.0508

7.8258

 Image 6

7.0688

5.8843

7.0688

7.4651

7.4632

6.6483

7.5923

6.3949

7.3507

YF

 Image 1

4.2938

3.1034

4.2938

4.6969

4.6444

4.1962

4.4254

4.1136

4.5492

 Image 2

4.7103

3.4205

4.7103

4.8841

4.8882

4.5318

4.8105

4.1881

4.6918

 Image 3

4.6965

3.4164

4.6965

4.2898

4.0718

4.5828

4.8450

3.7340

4.9105

 Image 4

5.2128

3.8475

5.2128

5.2600

5.2511

4.9808

5.3399

4.7239

5.0825

 Image 5

3.8014

2.7607

3.8014

3.4162

3.4312

3.6916

3.9933

3.8220

3.9198

 Image 6

3.8665

2.7464

3.8665

3.6413

3.3834

3.7931

3.9946

3.7089

3.8903

ORL

 Image 1

7.2911

5.9766

7.2911

7.7474

7.7194

7.1604

7.7833

7.3308

7.4561

 Image 2

7.4287

5.9811

7.4287

7.7244

7.7241

7.3292

7.8739

7.4295

7.2415

 Image 3

7.3419

5.9719

7.3419

7.7132

7.705

7.2402

7.8589

7.5324

7.2677

 Image 4

7.3675

5.9542

7.3675

7.5777

7.6382

7.2482

7.8178

7.646

7.7055

 Image 5

7.3794

5.9636

7.3794

7.4041

7.3967

7.2621

7.8876

7.6182

7.9296

 Image 6

7.4323

5.9823

7.4323

7.6305

7.6103

7.2897

7.8693

7.7043

7.1986