Skip to main content

Table 6 Performance comparison between the proposed algorithm and [16]

From: Hierarchical complexity control algorithm for HEVC based on coding unit depth decision

Sequence (class)

Our HM13.0

[16] HM16.9

Tc = 80%

Tc = 60%

Tc = 80%

Tc = 60%

BDBR/TS (%/%)

BDBR/TS (%/%)

BDBR/TS (%/%)

BDBR/TS (%/%)

Kimono (B)

1.84/21.19

4.18/40.50

0.44/23.39

0.98/41.65

ParkScene (B)

2.05/20.30

5.79/40.19

0.32/24.60

1.76/42.79

Cactus (B)

1.07/20.27

5.59/40.10

0.17/24.54

1.72/42.59

BasketballDrive (B)

3.34/20.37

5.95/39.85

0.23/21.20

1.95/38.99

BQTerrace (B)

1.67/20.52

3.96/40.10

0.28/21.67

2.02/40.43

BasketballDrill (B)

2.24/20.05

5.38/39.85

0.29/20.56

2.60/39.54

BQMall (C)

2.27/22.34

6.60/40.14

0.59/24.59

2.98/42.90

PartyScene (C)

1.83/20.16

5.31/39.72

0.17/21.28

1.43/39.92

RaceHorsesC (C)

2.08/22.45

4.64/40.93

0.30/23.39

1.95/41.57

BasketballPass (D)

2.32/20.00

6.30/39.79

0.64/26.90

2.08/44.21

BQSquare (D)

2.08/19.93

4.89/39.74

0.02/19.08

1.44/38.65

BlowingBubbles (D)

1.96/22.13

4.56/40.22

0.42/22.71

1.90/40.73

RaceHorses (E)

2.93/22.46

6.72/40.95

0.52/23.40

1.35/41.73

FourPeople (E)

0.50/20.09

1.06/39.80

1.24/19.90

3.06/39.11

Johnny (E)

0.32/21.38

0.86/40.80

1.32/19.29

2.64/38.04

KristenAndSara (E)

0.45/20.02

1.55/39.71

1.10/19.47

2.58/39.07

Average

1.81/20.85

4.58/40.15

0.50/22.27

2.03/40.75

MCE

0.86%

0.34%

2.53%

1.58%