Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance comparison of ICANet with other algorithms using the FERET database fb and fc represent expression and light changes, and dup1 and dup2 represent age changes

From: ICANet: a simple cascade linear convolution network for face recognition

Method

fb

fc

dup1

dup2

LBP [17]

93.00

51.00

61.00

50.00

DMMA [19]

98.10

98.50

81.60

83.20

G-LBP [20]

98.00

98.00

90.00

85.00

WPCA-POEM [21]

99.60

99.50

88.80

85.00

sPOEM+POD [22]

99.70

100

94.90

94.00

KDCV [20]

98.00

98.00

90.00

85.00

LGXP [23]

99.00

99.00

94.00

93.00

G-LQP [24]

99.90

100.0

93.20

91.00

GOM [25]

99.90

100

95.70

93.10

DFD [26]

99.40

100.0

91.80

92.30

MDML-DCPs [27]

99.75

100.0

96.12

95.73

PCANet [6]

99.58

100

95.43

94.02

ICANet

99.67

100

96.26

94.44

  1. The ICANet recognition performance in all four subsets reached the level of the current algorithm, with the best recognition performance achieved in dup1