Skip to main content

Table 2 The registration result comparison with some algorithms

From: Registration of infrared and visible light image based on visual saliency and scale invariant feature transform

 

Registration algorithm

Matching pairs

Accurate pairs

Accuracy rate (%)

Time (s)

Fig. 4a

SIFT

18

13

72.22

0.715

 

GLOH

19

15

78.95

0.652

Harris

33

22

66.67

0.578

The proposed algorithm

9

8

88.89

0.101

Fig. 4b

SIFT

32

27

84.38

1.312

 

GLOH

30

25

83.33

1.208

Harris

48

33

68.75

1.157

The proposed algorithm

21

20

95.24

0.172

Fig. 4c

SIFT

24

19

79.17

1.138

 

GLOH

26

21

80.77

1.087

Harris

43

29

67.44

0.958

The proposed algorithm

12

10

83.33

0.112

Fig. 4d

SIFT

38

31

81.58

1.498

 

GLOH

41

34

82.93

1.511

Harris

62

44

70.97

1.482

The proposed algorithm

26

23

88.46

0.187

Fig. 4e

SIFT

21

15

71.43

0.907

 

GLOH

19

15

78.95

0.843

Harris

30

19

63.33

0.829

The proposed algorithm

10

8

80

0.105

Fig. 4f

SIFT

27

20

74.07

1.226

 

GLOH

28

22

78.57

1.138

Harris

48

34

70.83

1.082

The proposed algorithm

18

16

88.89

0.167