| Registration algorithm | Matching pairs | Accurate pairs | Accuracy rate (%) | Time (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fig. 4a | SIFT | 18 | 13 | 72.22 | 0.715 |
 | GLOH | 19 | 15 | 78.95 | 0.652 |
Harris | 33 | 22 | 66.67 | 0.578 | |
The proposed algorithm | 9 | 8 | 88.89 | 0.101 | |
Fig. 4b | SIFT | 32 | 27 | 84.38 | 1.312 |
 | GLOH | 30 | 25 | 83.33 | 1.208 |
Harris | 48 | 33 | 68.75 | 1.157 | |
The proposed algorithm | 21 | 20 | 95.24 | 0.172 | |
Fig. 4c | SIFT | 24 | 19 | 79.17 | 1.138 |
 | GLOH | 26 | 21 | 80.77 | 1.087 |
Harris | 43 | 29 | 67.44 | 0.958 | |
The proposed algorithm | 12 | 10 | 83.33 | 0.112 | |
Fig. 4d | SIFT | 38 | 31 | 81.58 | 1.498 |
 | GLOH | 41 | 34 | 82.93 | 1.511 |
Harris | 62 | 44 | 70.97 | 1.482 | |
The proposed algorithm | 26 | 23 | 88.46 | 0.187 | |
Fig. 4e | SIFT | 21 | 15 | 71.43 | 0.907 |
 | GLOH | 19 | 15 | 78.95 | 0.843 |
Harris | 30 | 19 | 63.33 | 0.829 | |
The proposed algorithm | 10 | 8 | 80 | 0.105 | |
Fig. 4f | SIFT | 27 | 20 | 74.07 | 1.226 |
 | GLOH | 28 | 22 | 78.57 | 1.138 |
Harris | 48 | 34 | 70.83 | 1.082 | |
The proposed algorithm | 18 | 16 | 88.89 | 0.167 |