Skip to main content

Table 2 The registration result comparison with some algorithms

From: Registration of infrared and visible light image based on visual saliency and scale invariant feature transform

  Registration algorithm Matching pairs Accurate pairs Accuracy rate (%) Time (s)
Fig. 4a SIFT 18 13 72.22 0.715
  GLOH 19 15 78.95 0.652
Harris 33 22 66.67 0.578
The proposed algorithm 9 8 88.89 0.101
Fig. 4b SIFT 32 27 84.38 1.312
  GLOH 30 25 83.33 1.208
Harris 48 33 68.75 1.157
The proposed algorithm 21 20 95.24 0.172
Fig. 4c SIFT 24 19 79.17 1.138
  GLOH 26 21 80.77 1.087
Harris 43 29 67.44 0.958
The proposed algorithm 12 10 83.33 0.112
Fig. 4d SIFT 38 31 81.58 1.498
  GLOH 41 34 82.93 1.511
Harris 62 44 70.97 1.482
The proposed algorithm 26 23 88.46 0.187
Fig. 4e SIFT 21 15 71.43 0.907
  GLOH 19 15 78.95 0.843
Harris 30 19 63.33 0.829
The proposed algorithm 10 8 80 0.105
Fig. 4f SIFT 27 20 74.07 1.226
  GLOH 28 22 78.57 1.138
Harris 48 34 70.83 1.082
The proposed algorithm 18 16 88.89 0.167