Skip to main content

Table 3 Average SSIM for 90 and 100% of test sequences

From: Variational approach for capsule video frame interpolation

Method

Seq1

Seq2

Seq3

Seq4

Avg.

Frames ratio

90%

100%

90%

100%

90%

100%

90%

100%

90%

100%

TV-CLG1

0.997

0.994

0.987

0.986

0.997

0.995

0.995

0.994

0.994

0.993

SFlow2

0.997

0.995

0.988

0.987

0.997

0.995

0.996

0.994

0.994

0.993

Frame averaging

0.965

0.964

0.949

0.950

0.957

0.957

0.956

0.956

0.956

0.956

TV-L13

0.997

0.993

0.986

0.986

0.997

0.994

0.995

0.993

0.994

0.992

Proposed method without texture

0.997

0.995

0.986

0.985

0.997

0.994

0.995

0.994

0.994

0.992

Proposed method with texture

0.998

0.996

0.987

0.986

0.997

0.995

0.996

0.994

0.994

0.993

  1. The SSIM value in italics indicate the best performing method