A novel texture-based asymmetric visibility threshold model for stereoscopic video coding

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Table 12 The comparison of the bitrate saving performance of the three coding schemes

3D sequences	QP	Bitrate (kbps)			ΔR (%)
3D sequences	QP	Scheme I	Scheme II	Scheme III	Scheme II	Scheme III
Kendo	22	314.436	242.407	230.693	22.91	26.63
	27	119.424	105.175	103.666	11.93	13.20
	32	54.826	51.262	51.770	6.50	5.57
	37	29.071	28.464	29.078	2.09	−0.02
GT_Fly	22	835.426	614.126	557.582	26.49	33.26
	27	246.536	202.960	200.020	17.68	18.87
	32	77.578	73.986	74.084	4.63	4.50
	37	31.876	31.570	31.914	0.96	−0.12
Poznan_Street	22	1698.762	1025.426	908.394	39.64	46.53
	27	384.906	304.574	295.814	20.87	23.15
	32	127.966	117.668	118.514	8.05	7.39
	37	52.350	50.872	52.176	2.82	0.33
Poznan_Hall2	22	656.564	491.244	476.698	25.18	27.40
	27	195.836	168.718	169.342	13.85	13.53
	32	83.378	78.420	79.860	5.95	4.22
	37	41.812	40.870	41.820	2.25	−0.02
Shark	22	1101.391	882.893	797.345	19.84	27.61
	27	433.618	386.830	374.455	10.79	13.64
	32	183.406	174.151	174.970	5.05	4.60
	37	84.002	82.778	83.846	1.46	0.19
Undo_Dancer	22	1525.504	1116.582	880.100	26.81	42.31
	27	479.224	406.590	371.424	15.16	22.49
	32	173.054	163.408	159.410	5.57	7.88
	37	74.432	73.076	74.434	1.82	0.00
Average	22				26.81	33.95
	27				15.05	17.48
	32				5.96	5.69
	37				1.90	0.06
					12.43	14.30