Table 2 EER results of expression-based experiments for identical twins
From: Recognition of identical twins using fusion of various facial feature extractors
EER results (%) of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Expression (training-test) | Natural-natural | Natural-smiling | Smiling-smiling | |
Implemented algorithms | CNN | 13.41 | 24.44 | 0 |
PCA | 12.65 | 24.54 | 20.83 | |
HOG | 5.60 | 11.11 | 4.17 | |
LBP | 2.76 | 8.80 | 0 | |
Score fusion (PCA, HOG, LBP) | 3.76 | 11.11 | 3.13 | |
Score fusion (HOG, LBP) | 2.30 | 4.63 | 2.09 | |
Feature fusion (PCA, HOG, LBP) | 3.53 | 6.02 | 4.17 | |
Feature fusion (HOG, LBP) | 2.38 | 4.17 | 0 | |
Decision fusion (PCA, HOG, LBP) | 3.37 | 6.94 | 0 | |
Proposed method | 2.07 | 3.24 | 0 | |
Algorithms implemented in [18] | A | 4.50 | 7.00 | 4.20 |
B | 39.40 | 39.20 | 40.00 | |
C | 6.70 | 37.60 | 7.40 | |
D | 22.20 | 22.90 | 19.90 | |
E | 14.40 | 13.50 | 13.50 | |
F | 9.40 | 10.80 | 9.30 | |
G | 7.70 | 8.80 | 6.80 | |