Table 3 Experimental results on the ICDAR 2013 dataset [29]
From: Textline detection in degraded historical document images
| Â | DR l | RA l | FM l |
|---|---|---|---|
CUBS | 97.96% | 96.94% | 97.45% |
GOLESTAN-a,b | 98.23% | 98.34% | 98.28% |
LRDE | 96.94% | 97.57% | 97.25% |
MSHK | 91.66% | 90.06% | 90.85% |
NUS | 98.34% | 98.49% | 98.41% |
QATAR-a | 90.75% | 91.55% | 91.15% |
QATAR-b | 91.73% | 93.14% | 92.43% |
CVC | 91.28% | 89.06% | 90.16% |
IRISA | 97.85% | 96.93% | 97.39% |
†ILSP [28] | 96.11% | 94.82% | 95.46% |
†NCSR [17] | 92.37% | 92.48% | 92.43% |
†TEI [20] | 97.77% | 96.82% | 97.30% |
†Koo et al. [10] | 93.58% | 92.29% | 92.93% |
†Fernández-Mota et al. [3] | 96.30% | 94.58% | 95.43% |
†Ryu et al. [25] | 98.64% | 98.68% | 98.66% |
Proposed | 98.67% | 98.82% | 98.75% |