Table 3 Performance of various algorithms at different noise densities for MSE on Lena image corrupted by SPN
Noise in % | Image enhancement factor (IEF) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMF [30] | AMF [6] | PSMF [10] | αTMF α = 4 [30] | CWF [7] | DBA [13] | MDBMF [16] | CUDBMPF [15] | MDBUTMF [17] | MDBUMF-GM [18] | ACBSA [20] | AWMF [23] | DBIDWIF [PA] | |
10 | 89.0 | 246.8 | 219.8 | 16.78 | 95.9 | 214.6 | 932.01 | 32.3 | 630.8 | 928 | 447 | 259.1 | 901.6 |
20 | 61.0 | 281.3 | 124.9 | 16.58 | 37.2 | 317.2 | 694.84 | 32.1 | 552.6 | 820 | 434 | 357.7 | 857.7 |
30 | 21.4 | 254.4 | 74.54 | 10.85 | 14.4 | 283.3 | 568.85 | 31.8 | 565.4 | 698 | 446 | 428.3 | 800.6 |
40 | 9.18 | 192.9 | 40.11 | 7.24 | 6.94 | 255.3 | 439.51 | 31.4 | 509.1 | 514 | 406 | 436.8 | 694.8 |
50 | 4.95 | 78.3 | 39.6 | 5.35 | 3.92 | 204.7 | 322.13 | 31.1 | 384.8 | 404 | 345 | 425.2 | 604.3 |
60 | 2.95 | 25.07 | 19.12 | 4.14 | 2.57 | 162.7 | 217.05 | 30.3 | 282.1 | 277 | 184 | 357.3 | 521.7 |
70 | 2.03 | 9.17 | 1.98 | 3.45 | 1.83 | 125.3 | 144.8 | 30.2 | 183.4 | 188 | 194 | 281.1 | 424.8 |
80 | 1.49 | 4.37 | 1.48 | 2.96 | 1.42 | 74.7 | 90.66 | 29.3 | 110.5 | 109 | 120 | 197.3 | 329.1 |
90 | 1.18 | 2.5 | 1.19 | 2.65 | 1.16 | 38.7 | 40.2 | 27.4 | 45.5 | 44 | 116 | 100.9 | 213.9 |