EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Table 8 Estimation accuracy comparison between conventional algorithm and proposed method with JPEG compression for different demosaicing methods (unit %). Block size fixed to 256 × 256

From: Estimation of Bayer CFA pattern configuration based on singular value decomposition

Demosaicing method		JPEG compression (QF)
Demosaicing method		100	90	80	75	70	Average
Bilinear	[25]	92.71	56.39	36.12	30.61	29.59	49.08
Bilinear	Proposed	24.56	26.67	24.76	26.12	27.69	25.96
AHD	[25]	12.38	15.99	22.99	24.35	22.99	19.74
AHD	Proposed	26.05	27.28	27.69	29.12	28.37	27.70
VNG	[25]	82.79	43.13	33.47	37.70	30.95	45.61
VNG	Proposed	28.84	30.88	29.59	25.78	28.30	28.68
AMaZE	[25]	62.99	36.26	32.38	31.43	30.82	38.78
AMaZE	Proposed	28.91	27.35	28.03	28.71	28.69	28.14
DCB	[25]	46.73	34.49	39.39	39.32	36.80	39.35
DCB	Proposed	22.45	24.01	27.14	25.17	25.85	24.92
IGV	[25]	69.52	53.81	39.46	34.63	31.56	45.80
IGV	Proposed	30.14	31.43	31.77	30.34	29.93	30.72
LMMSE	[25]	71.09	41.09	29.12	25.65	26.26	38.64
LMMSE	Proposed	30.34	30.48	30.88	28.64	30.20	30.11
HPDH	[25]	28.10	22.38	24.22	24.35	23.47	24.50
HPDH	Proposed	28.91	28.37	27.28	28.98	28.71	28.45
Average	[25]	58.85	37.94	32.14	30.26	29.06
Average	Proposed	27.53	28.31	28.39	27.86	28.34

Back to article page