EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Table 5 Estimation accuracy comparison between existing algorithm and proposed method for various demosaicing methods (unit: %)

From: Estimation of Bayer CFA pattern configuration based on singular value decomposition

Demosaicing method		Block size (M)
Demosaicing method		32	64	128	256	512	Average
Bilinear	[25]	99.66	99.93	100.00	100.00	100.00	99.92
Bilinear	Proposed	96.33	97.96	98.44	98.91	99.73	98.27
AHD	[25]	54.29	56.53	58.44	58.64	61.70	57.92
AHD	Proposed	94.97	96.26	97.89	97.48	98.23	96.97
VNG	[25]	84.15	87.69	90.41	94.08	95.03	90.27
VNG	Proposed	96.46	98.03	98.78	98.98	99.39	98.33
AMaZE	[25]	59.86	64.90	68.16	71.43	76.94	68.26
AMaZE	Proposed	90.54	93.06	94.42	96.05	98.80	94.17
DCB	[25]	95.24	98.44	99.45	99.66	99.86	98.53
DCB	Proposed	99.39	99.73	99.86	99.93	99.93	99.77
IGV	[25]	67.01	69.87	72.96	75.85	80.00	73.14
IGV	Proposed	78.86	84.56	88.23	91.84	93.40	87.58
LMMSE	[25]	56.05	61.02	64.35	70.00	75.72	65.43
LMMSE	Proposed	79.05	90.68	95.51	98.03	99.12	92.48
HPDH	[25]	34.62	37.69	40.07	41.49	44.90	39.75
HPDH	Proposed	92.99	94.90	97.21	97.21	97.14	95.89
Average	[21]	68.86	72.01	74.23	76.39	79.27
Average	Proposed	91.20	94.40	96.29	97.30	97.97

Back to article page