Table 12 Comparison of the proposed method with some state-of-the-art methods
From: Robust image hashing through DWT-SVD and spectral residual method
Comparison parameters | Kozat [16] | Venkatesan [6] | Swaminathan [12] | Tang [2] | Zhao [3] | Tang [24] | Proposed hashing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Sensitive to corner forgery | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes |
2. Robust with arbitrary rotation | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
3. Tamper localization | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes |
4. Optimal TPR when FPR = 0 | 0.123 | 0.6374 | 0.8162 | 0.9012 | 0.8632 | 0.9584 | 0.9823 |
5. Optimal FPR when TPR = 1 | 0.9452 | 0.6271 | 0.3891 | 0.2034 | 0.3012 | 0.0912 | 0.0051 |
6. Sensitivity with content changes | Sensitive | Moderate | Moderate | Sensitive | Sensitive | Sensitive | Sensitive |
7. Average time (s) | 1.5 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 2.12 | 0.28 | 2.1 |