Table 10 Expression recognition rate (%) in CK
From: DTCTH: a discriminative local pattern descriptor for image classification
Techniques | CK | |
|---|---|---|
| Â | 6-class expression | 7-class expression |
Ranzato et al. [101] | – | 90.10 |
LBP, 2006 [13] | 92.60±2.90 | 88.90±3.50 |
LBP + Template Matching, | Â | Â |
2009 [18] | 84.50±5.20 | 79.10±4.60 |
Geometric feature + TAN, | Â | Â |
2003 [102] | – | 73.20 |
LBP + SVM, 2009 [18] | 91.50±3.10 | 88.10±3.80 |
Boosted-LBP, 2009 [18] | 89.80±4.70 | 85.00±4.50 |
Boosted-LBP + SVM, | Â | Â |
2009 [18] | 95.00±3.20 | 91.10±4.00 |
Gabor + SVM, 2003 [52] | – | 84.80 |
Gabor, 2009 [18] | 89.40±3.00 | 86.60±4.10 |
LDN + LSVM, 2013 [50] | 98.40±1.40 | 92.30±3.00 |
LGP (SPM) LSVM, 2013 | 93.36±3.76 | 88.97±4.18 |
OC-LBP (BoF) LSVM, 2013 | 84.84±5.29 | 78.17±5.50 |
LAID (SPM) LSVM, 2013 | 89.13±5.41 | 84.21±4.73 |
CLBP_S/M/C (SPM) LSVM, | Â | Â |
2010 | 85.44±4.92 | 78.59±5.78 |
LTP (SPM) LSVM, 2010 | 91.18±8.68 | 88.79±2.31 |
CENTRIST (SPM) LSVM, | Â | Â |
2011 | 89.84±7.90 | 86.69±2.04 |
Proposed (DTCTH + LSVM) | 98.98±1.29 | 92.75±5.43 |
Proposed (DTCTH + HI) | 97.76±2.43 | 93.89±2.63 |