Table 4 Recognition rates of different methods on the CASIA-B dataset
Method | Set A (%) | Set B (%) | Set C (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
TM [4] | 97.6 | 32.7 | 52.0 |
MG (x,y) + ACDA [23] | 100 | 43.1 | 77.8 |
SEIS [30] | 99 | 64 | 72 |
GEI+part-based [11] | 99.2 | 80.6 | 75.8 |
‘ ‘Typical” GEI1 [22] | 98.4 | 93.2 | 77.4 |
“Typical” GEI2 [22] | 99.6 | 88.3 | 81.1 |
“Typical” GEI3 [22] | 99.6 | 71.4 | 89.9 |
SGEI + GEI [20] | 99 | 84.2 | 80.6 |
FSS [12] | 98.79 | 92.74 | 77.82 |
STFD [31] | 95.4 | 52.0 | 60.9 |
MPoC [21] | 93.60 | 68.80 | 81.70 |
Proposed golden ratio-based method | 99.6 | 94.76 | 91.53 |