Table 2 Detection result at different levels of video quality factors
From: Recaptured video detection based on sensor pattern noise
| Â | QF100 | QF90 | QF80 | QF70 | QF60 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | TP | FP | TP | FP | TP | FP | TP | FP | TP | FP |
Proposed (k = 0) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.00 |
| Â | 1.00 | 0.01 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 0.95 | 0.01 | 0.69 | 0.01 |
| Â | 1.00 | 0.03 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.98 | 0.03 | 0.80 | 0.03 |
Proposed (k = 2) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
| Â | 1.00 | 0.01 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0.84 | 0.01 |
| Â | 1.00 | 0.03 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.90 | 0.03 |
Wang and Farid [11] | 0.82 | 0.35 | 0.83 | 0.35 | 0.94 | 0.35 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 0.87 | 0.35 |
Bestagini et al. [13] | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.00 |
Jung et al. [14] | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
Cao and Kot [9] | 0.78 | 0.27 | 0.78 | 0.27 | 0.77 | 0.27 | 0.78 | 0.27 | 0.76 | 0.27 |
Gao et al. [10] | 0.94 | 0.33 | 0.96 | 0.33 | 0.98 | 0.33 | 0.98 | 0.33 | 0.99 | 0.33 |