Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparing the mean and standard deviation of D meanR for the two methods in the images of categories 1 and 2 (Ellopt) where the position of the tomato is correctly estimated

From: Segmentation and size estimation of tomatoes from sequences of paired images

Sequence    Category 1   Category 2  
  N 1 \({N_{c}^{o}}\) \(\mu _{D_{\text {mean}R} }^{o}\) \(\sigma _{D_{\text {mean}R}}^{o}\) N c \(\mu _{D_{\text {mean}R} }\) \(\sigma _{D_{\text {mean}R}}\) Difference N 2 \({N_{c}^{o}}\) \(\mu _{D_{\text {mean}R}}^{o}\) \(\sigma _{D_{\text {mean}R}}^{o}\) N c \(\mu _{D_{\text {mean}R}}\) \(\sigma _{D_{\text {mean}R}}\) Difference
1 26 26 1.34 0.7 26 1.79 1.22 −0.45 2 2 1.9 0.47 2 2.14 0.57 −0.24
2 4 4 1.57 0.46 4 1.4 0.69 0.17 3 3 1.57 0.57 3 1.84 0.81 −0.27
3 21 21 2.87 2.1 21 3.46 2.43 −0.59 16 14 7.36 8.03 16 5.22 4 2.14
4 14 14 2.2 1.84 14 2.4 1.11 −0.2 13 12 6.21 5.55 13 4.39 2.17 1.82
5 5 5 4.54 1.28 5 3.15 1.2 1.39 12 12 3.48 1.63 12 3.37 2.13 0.11
6 0 0 0   6 6 4.63 3.75 6 2.49 1.71 2.14
7 25 25 1.7 0.5 25 1.48 0.55 0.22 12 10 4.5 4.52 10 4.27 4.55 0.23
8 20 20 5.4 5.01 20 3.21 2.06 2.19 14 14 4.73 2.38 14 4.35 1.95 0.38
9 1 1 5.24 0 1 2.61 0 2.63 14 13 5.07 4.08 14 5.06 4.07 0.01
10 5 5 1.75 0.4 5 1.46 0.76 0.29 3 2 5.15 2.98 2 1.82 5.85 3.33
11 4 4 10.18 6.21 4 4.06 3.73 6.12 5 4 8.95 0 5 4.86 2.66 4.09
12 19 18 4.35 1.34 19 4.09 1.36 0.26 0 0   0  
13 5 1 8.56 0 5 9.72 5.98 −1.16 17 13 9.26 4.83 17 7.76 3.51 1.5
14 4 4 9.18 2.96 4 6.24 1.74 2.94 16 16 11.44 7.62 15 7.23 3.17 4.21
15 0 0 0   13 13 5.93 8.07 13 3.04 1.4 2.89
16 21 21 4.46 1.21 21 3.46 1.14 1 0 0   0  
17 20 20 11.56 2.55 19 7.79 2.41 3.77 1 1 10.63 0 1 7.36 0 3.27
18 23 21 7.77 2.24 20 5.38 1.65 2.39 1 1 7.41 0 1 6.78 0 0.63
19 0 0 0   10 5 6.31 1.86 9 4.85 3.28 1.46
20 5 5 6.88 2.57 5 6.12 5.34 0.76 10 10 7.51 3.13 10 4.64 1.54 2.87
21 25 25 7.12 3.22 25 3.65 1.38 3.47 1 1 5.67 0 1 2.79 0 2.88
  247 240 5.37 1.92 243 3.97 1.93 1.40 169 152 6.20 3.13 164 4.43 2.28 1.76