Skip to main content

Table 4 Distribution of \(D_{\text {mean}R}^{i}\) and \(D_{\text {max}R}^{i}\) computed assuming \(\text {Ell}_{f4}^{i}\) and \(\text {Ell}_{\textit {opt}}^{i}\) as the final segmentation for the images of category 2. Also shown are the total number of images (N 2) of category 2 for each sequence and the number of images N c where the position of the tomato is correctly estimated \(\left (D_{\text {desc}}^{i}<\frac {{r_{s}^{i}}}{2}\right)\). Only five images were discarded using this criterion

From: Segmentation and size estimation of tomatoes from sequences of paired images

  N 2 N c Ell f4 Ellopt
    \(\mu _{D_{\text {mean}R}}\) \(\sigma _{D_{\text {mean}R}}\) \(\mu _{D_{\text {max}R}}\) \(\sigma _{D_{\text {max}R}}\) \(\mu _{D_{\text {mean}R}}\) \(\sigma _{D_{\text {mean}R}}\) \(\mu _{D_{\text {max}R}}\) \(\sigma _{D_{\text {max}R}}\)
Sequence 1 2 2 4.61 2.02 14.45 7.13 2.14 0.57 4.93 1.85
Sequence 2 3 3 2.32 0.91 5.4 2.42 1.84 0.81 5.24 2.51
Sequence 3 16 16 6.54 4.9 17.85 13.42 5.22 4 15.42 13.01
Sequence 4 13 13 4.77 2.18 13.66 7.19 4.39 2.17 12.55 7.27
Sequence 5 12 12 4.59 3.11 14.31 9.23 3.37 2.13 11.26 7.75
Sequence 6 6 6 2.64 1.7 7.75 4.76 2.49 1.71 7.1 4.7
Sequence 7 12 10 6.49 5.04 18.12 15.27 4.27 4.55 12.71 13.79
Sequence 8 14 14 5.4 2.1 15.13 7.18 4.35 1.95 12.96 7.45
Sequence 9 14 14 6.68 3.99 17.18 9.63 5.06 4.07 13.32 10.61
Sequence 10 3 2 12.18 5.64 31.36 9.57 1.82 5.85 31.37 8.73
Sequence 11 5 5 5.41 2.42 19.39 10.84 4.86 2.66 17.6 12.5
Sequence 12 0 0
Sequence 13 17 17 9.19 4.54 23.59 11.65 7.76 3.51 22.9 12.77
Sequence 14 16 15 8.28 3.31 21.56 10.12 7.23 3.17 21.15 11.31
Sequence 15 13 13 3.57 1.84 9.7 4.55 3.04 1.4 8.42 3.74
Sequence 16 0 0
Sequence 17 1 1 7.71 0 22.23 0 7.36 0 22.23 0
Sequence 18 1 1 6.78 0 17.4 0 6.78 0 17.4 0
Sequence 19 10 9 5.76 4.13 14.2 10.63 4.85 3.28 11.8 7.31
Sequence 20 10 10 5.8 2.84 14.48 6.16 4.64 1.54 11.01 3.21
Sequence 21 1 1 2.95 0 9.36 0 2.79 0 8.88 0
  169 164 6.06 3.84 16.41 10.37 4.43 2.28 14.27 10.46