Skip to main content

Table 3 Distribution of \(D_{\text {mean}R}^{i}\) and \(D_{\text {max}R}^{i}\) computed assuming \(\text {Ell}_{f4}^{i}\) or \(\text {Ell}_{\text {opt}}^{i}\) as the final segmentation for the images of category 1. Also shown are the total number of images (N 1) of category 1 for each sequence and the number of images N c where the position of the tomato is correctly estimated \(\left (D_{\text {desc}}^{i}<\frac {{r_{s}^{i}}}{2}\right)\). Only four images were discarded using this criterion

From: Segmentation and size estimation of tomatoes from sequences of paired images

  N 1 N c Ell f4 Ellopt
    \(\mu _{D_{\text {mean}R}}\) \(\sigma _{D_{\text {mean}R}}\) \(\mu _{D_{\text {max}R}}\) \(\sigma _{D_{\text {max}R}}\) \(\mu _{D_{\text {mean}R}}\) \(\sigma _{D_{\text {mean}R}}\) \(\mu _{D_{\text {max}R}}\) \(\sigma _{D_{\text {max}R}}\)
Sequence 1 26 26 2.86 1.81 8.73 5.93 1.79 1.22 5.57 4.1
Sequence 2 4 4 1.85 0.35 5.24 1.59 1.4 0.69 3.9 1.15
Sequence 3 21 21 1.28 2.68 10.99 6.49 3.46 2.43 9.45 7.48
Sequence 4 14 14 3.99 1.4 10.36 4.01 2.4 1.11 6.76 3.21
Sequence 5 5 5 3.51 1.5 10.42 3.82 3.15 1.2 8.87 2.69
Sequence 6 0 0
Sequence 7 25 25 1.89 0.88 5.45 3.09 1.48 0.55 4.43 1.84
Sequence 8 20 20 3.53 2.38 9.58 7.11 3.21 2.06 9.13 6.02
Sequence 9 1 1 2.87 0 9.03 0 2.61 0 8.55 0
Sequence 10 5 5 1.76 0.95 5.28 3.3 1.46 0.76 4.31 2.71
Sequence 11 4 4 4.6 3.94 15.39 14.65 4.06 3.73 14 14.03
Sequence 12 19 19 4.66 1.62 12.61 4.55 4.09 1.36 11.06 3.67
Sequence 13 5 5 9.88 5.98 15.87 15.24 9.72 5.98 25.87 15.9
Sequence 14 4 4 7.63 0.29 20.18 3.57 6.24 1.74 15.57 2.79
Sequence 15 0 0
Sequence 16 21 21 3.63 1.21 8.83 2.46 3.46 1.14 8.51 2.55
Sequence 17 20 19 8.12 2.53 17.62 5 7.79 2.41 17.01 4.45
Sequence 18 23 20 6.23 1.75 17.91 6.58 5.38 1.65 15.79 6.61
Sequence 19 0 0
Sequence 20 5 5 6.44 5.42 19.07 18.98 6.12 5.34 17.47 16.49
Sequence 21 25 25 3.75 1.42 9.38 2.79 3.65 1.38 9.38 2.79
  247 243 4.29 2.77 11.35 7.39 3.97 1.93 9.95 7.06