From: Soft-biometrics evaluation for people re-identification in uncontrolled multi-camera environments
Database | Method | Weighted | Identification rate (%) | False alarm rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
PETS 2006 | PCA-FV | Non-parametric | 99.82 | 0.18 |
PCA-FV | Parametric | 99.63 | 0.37 | |
DM | Non-parametric | 99.45 | 0.55 | |
DM | Parametric | 99.27 | 0.73 | |
KA | Non-parametric | 99.09 | 0.91 | |
KA | Parametric | 98.90 | 1.10 | |
PCA-FP | Non-parametric | 98.72 | 1.28 | |
CM | Non-parametric | 98.72 | 1.28 | |
Without weighted | – | 98.54 | 1.46 | |
PETS 2009 | DM | Parametric | 93.01 | 2.10 |
DM | Non-parametric | 93.01 | 2.80 | |
PCA-FV | Non-parametric | 90.56 | 3.50 | |
CM | Non-parametric | 90.21 | 3.50 | |
KA | Parametric | 90.21 | 3.85 | |
PCA-FV | Parametric | 89.86 | 3.85 | |
PCA-FP | Non-parametric | 89.51 | 3.50 | |
KA | Non-parametric | 89.16 | 3.50 | |
Without weighted | – | 88.81 | 3.50 | |
CAVIAR | PCA-FP | Non-parametric | 98.21 | 0.51 |
PCA-FV | Non-parametric | 97.83 | 0.13 | |
DM | Parametric | 97.70 | 0.13 | |
PCA-FV | Parametric | 97.57 | 0.26 | |
DM | Non-parametric | 97.06 | 0 | |
CM | Non-parametric | 96.93 | 0.13 | |
Without weighted | – | 96.68 | 2.04 | |
KA | Non-parametric | 96.17 | 0 | |
KA | Parametric | 95.91 | 0 | |
MUBA | KA | Non-parametric | 92.30 | 6.59 |
PCA-FP | Non-parametric | 91.93 | 6.46 | |
PCA-FV | Parametric | 91.21 | 7.40 | |
CM | Non-parametric | 91.15 | 7.39 | |
PCA-FV | Non-parametric | 90.20 | 8.75 | |
DM | Non-parametric | 89.83 | 7.45 | |
DM | Parametric | 89.56 | 6.99 | |
KA | Parametric | 87.65 | 6.63 | |
Without weighted | – | 87.10 | 10.53 |