Table 7 Best result in each database in a multi-camera scenario
From: Soft-biometrics evaluation for people re-identification in uncontrolled multi-camera environments
Database | Method | Weighted | Identification rate (%) | False alarm rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PETS 2006 | DM | Parametric | 96.16 (0.9616 in Fig. 10) | 3.78 (0.0378 in Fig. 10) |
PETS 2009 | PCA-FP | Non-parametric | 94.24 (0.9424 in Fig. 10) | 5.44 (0.0544 in Fig. 10) |
CAVIAR4REID | PCA-FV | Parametric | 75.23 (0.7523 in Fig. 10) | 24.76 (0.2476 in Fig. 10) |
SAIVT-SoftBio | KA | Parametric | 89.33 (0.8933 in Fig. 10) | 10.66 (0.1066 in Fig. 10) |
MUBA | PCA-FV | Parametric | 93.10 (0.9310 in Fig. 10) | 6.90 (0.0690 in Fig. 10) |