Table 5 The best result from each database under a mono-camera scenario
From: Soft-biometrics evaluation for people re-identification in uncontrolled multi-camera environments
Database | Method | Weighted | Identification rate (%) | False alarm rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PETS 2006 | PCA-FV | Non-parametric | 99.82 (0.9982 in Fig. 5) | 0.18 (0.0018 in Fig. 5) |
PETS 2009 | DM | Parametric | 93.01 (0.9301 in Fig. 5) | 2.10 (0.0210 in Fig. 5) |
CAVIAR | PCA-FP | Non-parametric | 98.21 (0.9821 in Fig. 5) | 0.51 (0.0051 in Fig. 5) |
MUBA | KA | Non-parametric | 92.30 (0.9230 in Fig. 5) | 6.59 (0.0659 in Fig. 5) |