From: Soft-biometrics evaluation for people re-identification in uncontrolled multi-camera environments
Database | Method | Weighted | Identification rate (%) | False alarm rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
PETS 2006 | DM | Parametric | 96.16 | 3.78 |
DM | Non-parametric | 96.16 | 3.84 | |
PCA-FV | Parametric | 95.51 | 4.37 | |
KA | Parametric | 95.26 | 4.68 | |
PCA-FP | Non-parametric | 94.89 | 5.05 | |
KA | Non-parametric | 94.58 | 5.30 | |
CM | Non-parametric | 94.58 | 5.30 | |
Without weighted | – | 94.58 | 5.36 | |
PCA-FV | Non-parametric | 94.42 | 5.42 | |
PETS 2009 | PCA-FP | Non-parametric | 94.24 | 5.44 |
DM | Parametric | 94.09 | 5.52 | |
KA | Parametric | 94.01 | 5.44 | |
KA | Non-parametric | 94.01 | 5.76 | |
Without weighted | – | 93.93 | 5.76 | |
CM | Non-parametric | 93.85 | 5.76 | |
DM | Non-parametric | 93.53 | 5.91 | |
PCA-FV | Non-parametric | 92.11 | 7.65 | |
PCA-FV | Parametric | 91.20 | 8.40 | |
MUBA | PCA-FV | Parametric | 93.10 | 6.90 |
KA | Parametric | 92.68 | 7.25 | |
KA | Non-parametric | 92.01 | 7.99 | |
DM | Parametric | 91.91 | 8.06 | |
DM | Non-parametric | 91.10 | 8.90 | |
CM | Non-parametric | 90.62 | 9.35 | |
PCA-FV | Non-parametric | 90.20 | 9.74 | |
Without weighted | – | 90.10 | 9.83 | |
PCA-FP | Non-parametric | 90.04 | 9.83 | |
SAIVT-SoftBio | KA | Parametric | 89.33 | 10.66 |
PCA-FV | Parametric | 89.24 | 10.75 | |
DM | Parametric | 88.94 | 11.05 | |
Without weighted | – | 88.86 | 11.13 | |
KA | Non-parametric | 88.84 | 11.15 | |
CM | Non-parametric | 88.57 | 11.42 | |
DM | Non-parametric | 88.02 | 11.97 | |
PCA-FP | Non-parametric | 87.52 | 12.47 | |
PCA-FV | Non-parametric | 87.09 | 12.90 | |
CAVIAR4REID | PCA-FV | Parametric | 75.23 | 24.76 |
DM | Non-parametric | 73.85 | 26.15 | |
DM | Parametric | 72.71 | 11.05 | |
PCA-FV | Parametric | 72.64 | 27.36 | |
DM | Non-parametric | 72.56 | 27.44 | |
CM | Non-parametric | 71.85 | 28.15 | |
KA | Parametric | 71.38 | 28.62 | |
KA | Non-parametric | 70.71 | 29.29 | |
Without weighted | – | 63.13 | 36.87 |