Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison between the algorithm in[9] and the proposed algorithm (Valid rate and Detection rate) for Figure15

From: Computer-assisted analysis of painting brushstrokes: digital image processing for unsupervised extraction of visible features from van Gogh’s works

Painting

Valid

Valid

Detection

Detection

ID

rate

rate

rate

rate

 

Li et al.

proposed

Li et al.

proposed

F218

42.7%

20.2%

21.6%

20.5%

F386

73.7%

41.6%

68.4%

59.7%

F518

60.7%

35.3%

75.2%

60.1%

F538

49.1%

23.5%

44.9%

32.2%

  1. The comparison of results obtained by using the algorithm in [9] and the one proposed in this paper is in terms of Valid rate and Detection rate for the patches in Figure 15. Higher values marked in italics are better.