No-reference image and video quality assessment: a classification and review of recent approaches

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Table 3 Characteristic summary of NR-B and hybrid metrics

Method	Reference	Processing	Resolution	Test data^a	Performance^b
Bitstream-based	Saad et al.[106]	Multiple	768 × 512	LIVE image	SC = 0.8
	Saad et al.[107]	Multiple	768 × 512	LIVE image	SC = 0.93, PC = 0.93
	Yamada et al.[144]	H.264/AVC	1,440 × 1,080	-	PC = 0.85
	Rossholm et al.[153]	H.264/AVC	QCIF	288 test videos	PC (PEVQ) = 0.95
	Shahid et al.[154]	H.264/AVC	QCIF	288 test videos	PC (PEVQ) = 0.98
	Shahid et al.[155]	H.264/AVC	QCIF, CIF	120 test videos	PC = 0.98
	Keimel et al.[156]	H.264/AVC	HD	-	PC = 0.93
	Lee[157]	H.264/AVC	QCIF	13 SRCs	PC = 0.9
	Ries et al.[158]	H.264/AVC	QCIF, SIF, CIF	-	PC = 0.80
	Yang et al.[162]	MPEG-4	QCIF	-	PC = 0.93, SC = 0.93
	Eden[165]	H.264/AVC	HD	5 SRCs	PC (PSNR) = 0.99
	Brandão et al.[166]	JPEG	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.97, SC = 0.97
	Brandão et al.[168]	H.264	-	50 test videos	PC = 0.93, SC = 0.95
	Zhang et al.[172]	JPEG2000	768 × 512	LIVE image	PC = 0.9
	Ichigaya et al.[191]	MPEG-2	SD, HD	26 test videos	PC (PSNR) = 0.95
Hybrid of NR-P and NR-B	Farias et al.[181]	H.264/AVC	CIF	5 SRCs	Regression (PSNR) = 0.79
	Shanableh[182]	MPEG-2	CIF	-	PC = 0.93
	Shanableh[183]	MPEG-2	CIF	-	NRMSE = 0.046
	Davis et al.[184]	H.264/AVC	-	18 test videos	PC = 0.91
	Yamada et al.[186]	H.264/AVC	SD	-	PC = 0.95
	Sugimoto et al.[189]	H.264/AVC	HD	14 SRCs	PC = 0.91

^aThe used test database; ^bperformance denotes the correlation with subjective assessment, unless stated otherwise. SRC, source sequence; NRMSE, normalized root mean square error; PC, Pearson’s correlation coefficient; SC, Spearman’s rank order correlation coefficient.