Table 3 Comparison of classification rates with LBP variants of[20] for training number of 20

${\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{\text{KDE}}}^{\mathrm{\text{PO}}}$

840

${\mathbf{F}}_{\mathit{\text{μσ}}}^{\mathrm{\text{PO}}}$

84

${\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{\text{KDE}}}^{\mathrm{\text{PO}}}$ out of class

840

${\mathbf{F}}_{\mathit{\text{μσ}}}^{\mathrm{\text{PO}}}$ out of class

84

${\mathrm{\text{LBP}}}_{24,3}^{\mathit{\text{riu}}2}/{\mathrm{\text{VAR}}}_{24,3}$[20]

416

${\mathrm{\text{LBP}}}_{8,1}^{\mathit{\text{riu}}2}/{\mathrm{\text{VAR}}}_{8,1}$[20]

160

${\mathrm{\text{LBP}}}_{24,3}^{\mathit{u}2}{\mathrm{\text{GM}}}_{\mathrm{\text{ES}}}$[20]

13251

${\mathrm{\text{LBP}}}_{8,1}^{\mathit{u}2}{\mathrm{\text{GM}}}_{\mathrm{\text{ES}}}$[20]

451

${\mathrm{\text{LBPV}}}_{24,3}^{\mathit{u}2}{\mathrm{\text{GM}}}_{\mathrm{PD}2}$[20]

2211

${\mathrm{\text{LBPV}}}_{8,1}^{\mathit{u}2}{\mathrm{\text{GM}}}_{\mathrm{PD}2}$[20]

227