EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Table 1 The PSNR comparison of the conventional and proposed methods using the average of the three channels (dB) on the 24 test images in Figure 7(a).

From: Edge Adaptive Color Demosaicking Based on the Spatial Correlation of the Bayer Color Difference

	ED			Indirect ED			Direct ED
	[7]	[13]	[14]	[20]	[21]	[22]	[23]	[25]	Proposed
1	34.036	37.080	38.781	33.733	35.333	35.335	35.379	36.090	36.421
2	39.142	39.639	41.237	39.173	39.525	40.010	39.446	40.748	40.746
3	41.190	41.760	42.956	40.777	41.974	42.232	41.771	42.611	42.757
4	39.950	40.616	41.289	38.965	39.860	39.878	39.837	40.415	40.530
5	35.512	37.406	38.263	35.023	36.338	36.440	35.890	36.853	37.431
6	35.206	38.159	40.458	35.083	38.001	38.070	37.661	38.290	38.589
7	40.704	41.686	42.277	41.016	41.267	41.490	40.935	42.130	42.708
8	30.974	34.487	36.385	32.293	33.969	33.934	34.059	34.539	35.596
9	39.785	41.298	42.813	40.277	41.371	41.526	41.314	41.748	42.292
10	40.265	41.562	42.277	39.841	41.038	41.174	40.717	41.276	41.738
11	36.596	39.000	40.236	36.298	37.947	37.988	37.648	38.661	39.087
12	40.300	42.325	43.653	40.866	42.238	42.500	42.032	42.732	42.899
13	31.545	34.096	35.062	29.857	31.951	31.643	31.791	32.417	32.781
14	35.940	36.280	37.198	35.823	35.954	36.402	36.209	37.263	37.270
15	38.811	39.492	40.133	37.682	38.871	39.003	38.842	39.250	39.662
16	38.327	41.454	44.026	38.664	41.982	42.009	41.486	41.761	42.358
17	39.367	40.850	41.611	38.542	39.920	39.693	39.512	40.213	40.663
18	35.364	36.714	37.210	33.898	35.225	34.942	34.860	35.699	36.112
19	35.512	38.511	40.809	37.338	38.677	38.688	38.667	39.503	39.958
20	38.954	40.596	41.442	38.547	39.543	39.400	39.299	40.376	40.702
21	36.039	38.558	39.502	35.396	36.923	36.694	36.723	37.675	38.035
22	36.941	37.766	38.507	36.564	37.119	37.339	36.970	37.832	38.169
23	42.118	42.186	43.297	42.107	42.322	42.628	42.407	42.595	43.217
24	33.905	34.871	35.765	32.232	34.168	33.913	33.630	34.164	34.467
avg.	37.353	39.016	40.216	37.083	38.397	38.455	38.212	38.952	39.341

Back to article page