Skip to main content
Figure 8 | EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Figure 8

From: Design and Optimization of the VideoWeb Wireless Camera Network

Figure 8

The top 8 dominating camera configurations as chosen by 37 cameras. Graphs are ordered by the percentage of cameras in which the particular configuration was Pareto-efficient and all metrics are normalized to 1.0 across all cameras. Clockwise from the top: resolution ranges from 176 120 to 704 480 (higher is better), JPEG compression settings range from 0 to 100 (lower is better, so inverse is shown), and frame rates range from 0 to 30 FPS (higher is better). For measuring the "smoothness" of outputted video, the standard deviation of the frame rate (recorded at 1-second intervals) and maximum lag time between any two sequential frames is recorded (lower is better, so inverse is shown).100% of cameras:  pixels, 0% compression97% of cameras:  pixels, 0% compression94% of cameras:  pixels, 20% compression91% of cameras:  pixels, 0% compression74% of cameras:  pixels, 0% compression66% of cameras:  pixels, 60% compression63% of cameras:  pixels, 30% compression54% of cameras: pixels, 20% compression

Back to article page