Table 3 This tableshows the comparison of dynamic programming w.r.t adhoc matching on the two datasets (W for Watertight, P for Princeton). We use our pose estimation and alignment technique and we generate 3 views per 3D object. DP stands for dynamic programming while NM stands for naive matching.
From: From 2D Silhouettes to 3D Object Retrieval: Contributions and Benchmarking
NN (%) | FT (%) | ST (%) | DCG (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DP + pruning ( | W | 95.2 | 62.7 | 73.7 | 86.9 |
P | 67.1 | 39.8 | 51 | 66.1 | |
NM + pruning ( | W | 92 | 57.7 | 71.9 | 84.5 |
P | 65.8 | 37.7 | 48.7 | 64.6 | |
DP + pruning ( | W | 95.5 | 62.8 | 73.7 | 86.9 |
P | 66.1 | 40.1 | 51 | 66 | |
NM + pruning ( | W | 91.5 | 52.6 | 63.8 | 81.1 |
P | 62.9 | 35.4 | 45.2 | 62.6 |
)
)
)
)