Table 5 Significance of the difference between Pearson correlation coefficients on TID-masked noise database
From: Multi-level contrast filtering in image difference metrics
Metric | PSNR | PSNR-HVS-M | S-CIELAB | SSIM | VSNR | WLF-DEE-C I | WLF-DEE-C J | WLF-DEE-C K | WLF-DEE-C L | WLF-DEE-C M | WLF-DEE-C N | WLF-DEE-C O | WLF-DEE-C P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSNR | - | ||||||||||||
PSNR-HVS-M | 0.08 | - | |||||||||||
S-CIELAB | -1.08 | -1.16 | - | ||||||||||
SSIM | -2.13a | -2.21a | -1.04 | - | |||||||||
VSNR | 0.57 | 0.49 | 1.65 | 2.69a | - | ||||||||
WLF-DEE-C I | -0.59 | -0.67 | 0.50 | 1.54 | -1.16 | - | |||||||
WLF-DEE-C J | -0.60 | -0.68 | 0.48 | 1.53 | -1.17 | -0.01 | - | ||||||
WLF-DEE-C K | -1.10 | -1.19 | -0.02 | 1.02 | -1.67 | -0.52 | -0.50 | - | |||||
WLF-DEE-C L | -0.30 | -0.38 | 0.78 | 1.82 | -0.87 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.80 | - | ||||
WLF-DEE-C M | 1.94 | 1.86 | 3.02a | 4.07a | 1.37 | 2.53a | 2.54a | 3.05a | 2.24a | - | |||
WLF-DEE-C N | 0.62 | 0.54 | 1.70 | 2.75a | 0.05 | 1.21 | 1.22 | 1.72 | 0.92 | -1.32 | - | ||
WLF-DEE-C O | 0.32 | 0.23 | 1.40 | 2.44a | -0.25 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 1.42 | 0.62 | -1.63 | -0.30 | - | |
WLF-DEE-C P | 0.62 | 0.53 | 1.70 | 2.74a | 0.05 | 1.20 | 1.21 | 1.72 | 0.92 | -1.33 | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |