Skip to main content

Table 2 Pearson correlation for WLF-DEE and the selected state-of-the-art metrics on all databases

From: Multi-level contrast filtering in image difference metrics

Metric

TID (masked noise)

TID (quantization noise)

TID (image denoising)

TID (contrast change)

Ajagamelle

Pedersen

 

Linear

Logistic

Linear

Logistic

Linear

Logistic

Linear

Logistic

Linear

Logistic

Linear

Logistic

PSNR

0.57

0.59

0.50

0.51

0.55

0.55

0.47

0.49

0.73a

0.80a

0.66

0.66

PSNR-HVS-M

0.57

0.58

0.52

0.53

0.56

0.57

0.49

0.49

0.72

0.78

0.66

0.66

S-CIELAB

0.62

0.68

0.63

0.66

0.66

0.71

0.60

0.64

0.67

0.79

0.80a

0.85a

SSIM

0.71a

0.75a

0.83a

0.85a

0.79a

0.81a

0.73

0.76

0.64

0.64

0.22

0.22

VSNR

0.52

0.53

0.45

0.50

0.53

0.54

0.47

0.47

0.16

0.28

0.02

0.02

WLF-DEE-C I

0.60

0.64

0.72

0.75

0.62

0.62

0.65b

0.69b

0.39b

0.65b

0.27b

0.49b

WLF-DEE-C J

0.61b

0.64

0.74

0.76

0.64

0.64

0.62

0.66

0.39

0.62

0.27b

0.44

WLF-DEE-C K

0.61b

0.68b

0.75b

0.77b

0.66b

0.71b

0.63

0.67

0.38

0.60

0.27b

0.44

WLF-DEE-C L

0.57

0.62

0.68

0.71

0.58

0.66

0.59

0.67

0.40

0.64

0.27b

0.45

WLF-DEE-C M

0.35

0.38

0.25

0.55

0.22

0.22

0.25

0.53

0.21

0.26

0.16

0.17

WLF-DEE-C N

0.38

0.53

0.33

0.58

0.23

0.60

0.29

0.55

0.20

0.20

0.16

0.19

WLF-DEE-C O

0.39

0.56

0.38

0.62

0.24

0.62

0.34

0.57

0.20

0.34

0.17

0.40

WLF-DEE-C P

0.32

0.53

0.26

0.57

0.19

0.60

0.24

0.54

0.21

0.31

0.17

0.47

  1. aThe most performant metric.bThe highest performance of WLF-DEE.