Table 1 Detection performance comparisons
From: Efficient face detection method with eye region judgment
| Â | Database | Detection rate (%) | False positive rate |
|---|---|---|---|
Traditional Adaboost face detector with Haar-like features | FERET | 97.3264 | 4.094 × 10−5 |
The hybrid Adaboost-based face detector of PFMPF and PBHFA | 96.4839 | 5.588 × 10−4 | |
Proposed system | 97.0745 | 4.464 × 10−5 | |
Traditional Adaboost face detector with Haar-like features | CMU | 90.4635 | 3.485 × 10−3 |
The hybrid Adaboost-based face detector of PFMPF and PBHFA | 86.7904 | 1.594 × 10−2 | |
Proposed system |  | 89.9178 | 4.344 × 10−3 |